<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ramble &#187; Security Theater</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alterzone.net/blog/category/security-theater/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alterzone.net/blog</link>
	<description>Where the Future Never Looks the Same Way Twice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:43:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Airport &#8220;Security&#8221; Inanity Dissected at NYTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://www.alterzone.net/blog/2007/12/29/airport-security-inanity-dissected-at-nytimescom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alterzone.net/blog/2007/12/29/airport-security-inanity-dissected-at-nytimescom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tolton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security Theater]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alterzone.net/blog/2007/12/29/airport-security-inanity-dissected-at-nytimescom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patrick Smith, of Salon&#8217;s Ask the Pilot fame, has posted an eloquent essay on the New York Times Jet Lagged blog about the inanity of airport &#8220;security&#8221;. It sounds like he has been reading Bruce Schneier. Refuse to be Terrorized!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick Smith, of <a href="http://www.salon.com" title="Salon.com">Salon&#8217;s</a> <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/ask_the_pilot/" title="Ask the Pilot Archive">Ask the Pilot</a> fame, has
posted an eloquent <a href="http://jetlagged.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/12/28/the-airport-security-follies/" title="Airport Security Follies">essay</a> on the New York Times <a href="http://jetlagged.blogs.nytimes.com" title="Jet Lagged Blog">Jet Lagged</a> blog about
the inanity of airport &#8220;security&#8221;.  It sounds like he has been
reading <a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/" title="Schneier on Security">Bruce Schneier</a>.  <a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/08/what_the_terror.html" title="Refuse to be Terrorized!">Refuse to be Terrorized</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alterzone.net/blog/2007/12/29/airport-security-inanity-dissected-at-nytimescom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Stupid TSA Antics</title>
		<link>http://www.alterzone.net/blog/2007/10/02/more-stupid-tsa-antics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alterzone.net/blog/2007/10/02/more-stupid-tsa-antics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 12:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Tolton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security Theater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alterzone.net/blog/2007/10/02/more-stupid-tsa-antics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First it was shoes, then the War on Moisture, now even children&#8217;s toys are a threat to our national security: Citing “credible specific information” about terror tactics, Transportation Security Administration officers nationwide on Monday stepped up their scrutiny of passengers carrying remote-control toys aboard airplanes. The move was not motivated by a specific terror plot, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First it was shoes, then the War on Moisture, now even children&#8217;s <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/02/us/nationalspecial3/02tsa.html?ref=us">toys</a> are a threat to our national security:</p>

<blockquote>Citing “credible specific information” about terror tactics, Transportation Security Administration officers nationwide on Monday stepped up their scrutiny of passengers carrying remote-control toys aboard airplanes.

The move was not motivated by a specific terror plot, said Kip Hawley, the assistant secretary at the Department of Homeland Security in charge of aviation security. But there is concern both in the United States and internationally that common remote-control toys could be used to detonate a bomb as part of a terror plot. The aviation authorities decided against banning the devices in carry-on bags. But people carrying remote-control toys — including children — could be subject to a more intense search, in which the passenger is patted down and the baggage is checked by hand, officials said.</blockquote>

<p>My favorite part:</p>

<blockquote>The new scrutiny for remote-control toys will not extend to devices that automatically open car doors or to television remote controls, a T.S.A. spokeswoman said.</blockquote>

<p>So, radio controlled cars from Radio Shack are dangerous because they could be converted into a detonator for a bomb, but television remotes are somehow immune?  And, what about cell phones, pagers, iPods, etc. that people routinely bring on a plane?  This is really stupid.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.schneier.com/essay-124.html">Refuse to be terrorized</a>, people!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alterzone.net/blog/2007/10/02/more-stupid-tsa-antics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

